Time and the Conways and Other Plays (I Have Been Here Before, An Inspector Calls, The Linden Tree)

Product Information

The English author J. B. Priestley wrote a number of dramas during the 1930s and 40s, which have come to be known as his Time Plays. [1] They are so called because each constructs its plot around a particular concept of time. In the plays, various theories of time become a central theatrical device of the play, the characters' lives being affected by how they react to the unusual temporal landscape they encounter. [2] His prolific output continued right up to his final years, and to the end he remained the great literary all-rounder. His favourite among his books was for many years the novel Bright Day, though he later said he had come to prefer The Image Men. The overlap with Strange Interlude is in the conflict between peepholes and landscapes. Conways covers roughly the same period of time (even the same years) as Strange Interlude, and both distort the audience’s ability to experience this time. Where Strange Interlude portrays half-hour clippings throughout the lives of the characters, Time and the Conways portrays two moments at either end of the continuum. However, the way Priestley presents these two moments actually removes the audience from the experience of the characters, where O’Neill fixated on pressing the audience as close to the experience and thoughts of the characters as possible. The audience has a pretty firm grasp on the events of these twenty years after Act II of Priestley’s play, so going into Act III, seeing the foolishness and naiveté of the characters is frustrating and painful. The audience is squirming, while almost every character is celebrating in blissful ignorance. The only character that shares the experience of the audience is Kay, when she glimpses the future.

A new BBC Radio 3 adaptation was broadcast on 14 September 2014[13] with Harriet Walter as Mrs. Conway, Anna Madeley as Kay, Rupert Evans as Alan and Michael Bertenshaw as J. B. Priestley.[citation needed] The Conway children, who number six, individually divulge their hopes and plans for the future, so far as they've made any at all. These mostly comprise expectations of marital bliss with the right partner but one daughter plans to be a novelist, another a social campaigner while the youngest and least affected of their number, the bright 18-year-old Carol dreams of the stage but most of all just living her life to the full.Making use of information from any act, and either adding or subtracting nineteen years (between twenty-first and fortieth birthdays), we gain the following information: Character Their conversation contrasts strongly with that of Madge and Gerald, who now come on stage. Madge and Gerald argue about the miners' strike in support of their campaign for nationalization. Though Madge and Gerald hold differing views they both enjoy this kind of heated political debate. The most poignant example is the youngest Carol, played to perfection by Faye Castelow, who is doomed to prove that only the good die young. The young actress has effortlessly stepped up from notable performances in the Havel Season at the Orange Tree and should be set for a sparkling career. Act Two plunges us into the shattered lives of the Conways exactly eighteen years later. Gathering in the same room where they were celebrating in Act One we see how their lives have failed in different ways. Robin has become a dissolute travelling salesman, estranged from his wife Joan, Madge has failed to realise her socialist dreams, Carol is dead, Hazel is married to the sadistic but wealthy Ernest. Kay has succeeded to a certain extent as an independent woman but has not realised her dreams of novel writing. Worst of all, Mrs Conway's fortune has been squandered, the family home is to be sold and the children's inheritance is gone. As the Act unfolds resentments and tensions explode and the Conways are split apart by misery and grief. Only Alan, the quietest of the family, seems to possess a quiet calm. In the final scene of the Act, Alan and Kay are left on stage and, as Kay expresses her misery Alan suggests to her that the secret of life is to understand its true reality – that the perception that Time is linear and that we have to grab and take what we can before we die is false. If we can see Time as eternally present, that at any given moment we are seeing only 'a cross section of ourselves,' then we can transcend our suffering and find no need to hurt or have conflict with other people.

There's little sign of conservatism in Second Coming/Winter, Again, the new double bill from Dundee Rep's resident sister company, Scottish Dance Theatre. It is difficult to imagine a more distinct contrast between two modern dance pieces than exists here between the works of Los Angeles choreographer Victor Quijada and his Norwegian counterpart Jo Strømgren.

The action we see is set in a family living-room (not the formal drawing-room where the guests are assembled). A game of charades is being played, and the six Conway children and their widowed mother appear as they find costume and props, and prepare their lines, before going (off-stage) into the drawing-room to perform the charade. In the course of this act, a number of their guests also appear: in fact the whole cast (save for Carol in Act Two) is on stage at some time in each of the three acts. Although Priestley gives information in the stage directions about the ages of all of the characters, this is not wholly clear to the audience: apart from Carol, all the Conway children are in their twenties, and they seem to have been born about a year apart: Alan is the eldest, then come Madge, Robin, Hazel, Kay and Carol. The play works on the level of a universal human tragedy and a powerful portrait of the history of Britain between the Wars. Priestley shows how through a process of complacency and class arrogance, Britain allowed itself to decline and collapse between 1919 and 1937, instead of realizing the availability of immense creative and humanistic potential accessible during the post-war (theGreat War) generation. Priestley could clearly see the tide of history leading towards another major European conflict as he has his character Ernest comment in 1937 that they are coming to ‘the next war’. As for this one ..we meet the Conways in 1919, at a daughter's 21st birthday. The Conways are attractive, well-liked, affluent, and survived the war well (with the exception of the father). They banter with each other, tease each other a little - brother Robin comes home that night, friend Gerald brings in a man who's been dying to meet them... Priestley uses the idea to show how human beings experience loss, failure and the death of their dreams but also how, if they could experience reality in its transcendent nature, they might find a way out. The idea is not dissimilar to that presented by mysticism and religion that if human beings could understand the transcendent nature of their existence the need for greed and conflict would come to an end. It is at this point that we learn, from a remark of Mrs. Conway's about flowers on the grave (put there by Alan), that Carol has died (two years after the events of Act One). Beevers, who has remained silent while Gerald has explained about the family's finances, now remarks that Carol was the best of the lot "worth all the rest of you put together"; though she despises Ernest, Mrs. Conway agrees with this verdict.

other properties. The family begins to argue, and Madge accuses her mother of wasting money on her favorite son, Robin. At first it appears that nothing has changed. We see Kay sitting in the same place as at the end of Act One, but as the lights come up we see that she is older, and we realize that time has passed. In fact it is nineteen years later (Kay's 40th birthday, in 1938 [1937 is given in the text of the play, but this would make Kay 39]). The details of the various characters' lives emerge from their conversation. Alan's retreat into the dull life of a shabby town hall clerk follows his disappointment in love: he is in love with Joan, and his stability and patience might enable her to achieve domestic happiness. Alan follows Joan as the game of "Hide and Seek" begins, but she begs him to leave, as she is attracted to the dashing but worthless Robin; she is infatuated with him but cannot see that they are ill-matched - she is too weak to sort him out, and he will not accept his responsibility as a husband or father: Mrs. Conway is pleased by the courtship as she is incapable of seeing her younger son's failings. You might comment on similarities between Young Tom Gradgrind and Robin Conway, or a mixture of similarity and contrast between Mr. Bounderby and Ernest Beevers. What is your opinion of the way the two texts present the idea of seeing or failing to see what the future will bring? Note that both authors tell the reader/audience things the characters have yet to discover.

Neil Diamond Gets Standing Ovation

For a final flourish, once you've done enough nicing, you might want to close with this characteristically recherché quibble from Nightingale. "Why," he asks, "must Francesca Annis, playing the Conway matriarch, suddenly transform herself from a blithely overbearing, sublimely tactless Ranevskaya into a rasping Medea?" But you're going to have to Google those yourself. The other part of Dunne’s theory—that even though we experience time “from one peephole to the next” as Alan puts it, time itself is a “whole landscape” (177) without vector—overlaps with the treatment of time in Top Girls and in Strange Interlude. Time and the Conways doesn’t mix up different moments in time as much as Top Girls does, but by splicing the scene in the present into the middle of the scene in 1919, Priestley is encouraging the audience to look at the events in this play as a landscape rather than a fixed sequence of events (as he presented time in Dangerous Corner.) The audience can see both the ruptures in this landscape, and the smooth, natural flows connecting different moments. Watching Act III, we can see how the over-confidence of the Conways, and Mrs. Conway’s unwillingness to sell any holdings until the economy improves in the post-war boom (which never came for Britain) flows into their demise in Act II. We also see the painful, ugly disjuncture of time with Carol, the youngest Conway who we know to be long dead in Act II, gushing about all her ambitions and desires, all the things she wants to accomplish with her life.

The second act keeps the same room as its setting, but jumps forward to 1937 (which was the present day when the play was first performed) and Kay’s 40th birthday. The mood is bleak, a new war is approaching and this future has not been kind to the Conways. The Long Mirror, in which a woman artist has a curiously intimate relationship with a musician she has never met but has shared his life for five years in the spirit finally meet at a Welsh hotel; Casting: Jim Carnahan, CSAand Jillian Cimini, C.S.A.; Press Representative: Polk & Co.; Fight direction by Thomas Schall; Roundabout Director of Marketing: Elizabeth Kandel; Roundabout Director of Development: Christopher Nave, CFRE; Roundabout Founding Director: Gene Feist; Associate Artistic Dir: Scott Ellis; Advertising: SPOTCo, Inc.; Interactive Marketing: Situation Interactive; Dialect Coach: Deborah Hecht; Photographer: Joan Marcus ReferencesSynopsis 'Time and the Conways’ by JB Priestley follows the fortunes of one family over a period of years, and offers a moving perspective on the abstract nature of the past, present and future. It is 1919, the War is over and the Conway family are celebrating their daughter Kay’s 21st birthday. But her sudden premonition of their lives in 1937 casts a shadow over their dreams and expectations. This BBC Radio production features a distinguished cast including Marcia Warren, Stella Gonet, Belinda Sinclair, Amanda Redman and Toby Stephens. Series Classic Radio Theatre, Series Language English Country Great Britain Year of release 1994 Notes Originally broadcast by BBC Radio 4 on 12 August 1994. Subjects Drama Credits Writer J B Priestley Cast Amanda Redman It is in Act Three that the seeds are sown of the characters' future unhappiness: and it is because we already know (having seen Act Two) how different their future is to be from what they expect, that this Act is so painful to witness. Priestley's skill as a playwright also appears in the way in which he has shown us in the previous act what to look out for here. J B Priestley gave the National Theatre one of its biggest ever hits with Stephen Daldry's revival of An Inspector Calls, which is still touring 17 years on. A BBC Radio 4 adaptation was directed by Sue Wilson and broadcast on 12 August 1994 (later re-broadcast on 23 May 2010 over BBC Radio 7). The cast included Marcia Warren as Mrs. Conway, Belinda Sinclair as Kay, John Duttine as Alan, Toby Stephens as Robin, Emma Fielding as Carol, Stella Gonet as Madge, Amanda Redman as Hazel, John McArdle as Ernest and Christopher Scott as Gerald. [12] ENGLISH: Together with An Inspector Calls, this is my favorite play by J.B. Priestley. This is the seventh time I have watched or read this play. The Linden Tree is also very nice, with a title quite difficult to translate into Spanish, as in English it has a double meaning.