Act of Oblivion: The Sunday Times Bestseller

Product Information

House of Commons Journal Volume 8, 8 June 1660 House of Commons Journal Volume 8, 8 June 1660 The twenty who punishment did not extend to life were added to the list. The lands of the Crown and the established Church were automatically restored, but lands of Royalists and other dissenters confiscated and sold during the Civil War and interregnum were left for private negotiation or litigation, meaning that the government would not help the Loyalists in regaining their property. Disappointed Royalists commented that the Act meant "indemnity for [Charles'] enemies and oblivion for his friends". [3] Historians, on the other hand, have generally praised the King and Clarendon for the generosity and clemency of the Act, in an age not normally noted for mercy. [4] Twenty years later, during the Popish Plot, Charles tried unsuccessfully to stand against the relentless demand for the execution of Catholic priests, and reminded the public sharply of how many of them had previously benefited from his reluctance to shed blood. [5] a decisive moment happens in the English Civil War with the execution of King Charles I. 1660, Oliver Cromwell is dead having won the war but his short-lived Republic is over and the Restoration of the Monarchy has happened with Charles II installed as King of Britland. Parliament passes an “Act of Oblivion” which pardons everyone who committed crimes during the Civil War and subsequent Commonwealth period - except for 59 “Regicides” who signed their names on the King’s death warrant. The promise of oblivion is that it accomplishes the impossible—it unrings bells and unpoisons wells—to place us on a more promising alternate timeline. As such, it can be seen as a form of transitional justice: We might ask, then, why such Acts of Oblivion have themselves been forgotten.

Meanwhile, Nayler is frantically searching for their whereabouts whilst dealing with the other 49 regicides. What follows is a monumental tour-de-force; a story that you will never forget. I почти никак не бяха засегнати, а малкото препратки бяха с размера и с вълнуващия стил на бележка под линия. The novel begins in America, with the protagonists (or antagonists depending on your viewpoint) Colonel Whalley and Colonel Goffe arriving to stay with Puritan supporters. They are haggard after weeks at sea and still reeling from their loss, and the separation of their families. The details of the regicides’ journey are historically accurate, Harris assures us, although he is obliged to speculate when it comes to the latter part of the story. History has not provided us with any information about the identity of the duo’s pursuers, so he has invented a splendid character called Richard Nayler, clerk of the Privy Council and general fixer to the aristocracy. Although Nayler loathes the sybaritic Charles II, he hounds Whalley and Goffe so remorselessly as to make Inspector Javert look like a nine-to-fiver. The narration by Tim McInnerny was excellent, with just enough change in vocal characterisations to be able to distinguish the main actors amongst quite a large cast of characters.Act Of Oblivion offers a resonant history of both England and America as they struggle to forge a myth of nationhood out of opposing ideologies * Daily Mail *

I have been waiting for most of my life for Robert Harris to write a novel that is not gripping, insightful and entertaining. I am waiting still -- Ben Macintyre * The Times * This was a very turbulent time in history, dominated as it was by religion and politics, vile atrocities on both sides, and Harris’s research brings it very much to life. This is a master storyteller at work. An exceptional, exciting, and suspenseful chase, a magnificent piece of historical fiction, very difficult to put down, and in my humble opinion, an absolute must read. The most richly accomplished of the brothers’ pairings to date—and given Connelly’s high standards, that’s saying a lot. All of the characters in the book were real people with one exception: Richard Nayler, the chief regicide hunter. Harris has filled in gaps in what we know of the personalities of the principals and the events of their lives from 1660 onward. As the German poet and philosopher Novalis remarked more than two centuries ago, novels arise out of the shortcomings of history. Harris sets out to plug the gaps in the record, and succeeds remarkably well. He’s writing fiction, but he treats the few available facts and the more plausible theories with respect, and skilfully extrapolates from them.A disappointing one for me, then, though most people seem to be loving it, so as usual it clearly comes down to subjective taste. The stuff about the new settlements in America was the most interesting part for me, although Harris dragged it out for far too long. He assumes people will know the basic history of Cromwell and the Restoration, and puts no political element into the plot. I felt that more concentration on the Restoration and less on these two runaways would have given scope for more interest. There’s only so much you can say about two men hiding in a barn, or a cellar, or an attic, or even the wilderness. A similar structural critique could be made of the Act of Oblivion. Writing of sixteenth-century France, Andrea Frisch observes: “Unlike royal pardon . . . which locate[s] political agency in the sovereign, the policy of oubliance places the burden of reconciliation on French subjects.” 19 Open this footnote Close this footnote 19 Meyler, supra note 1, at 181 (quoting Andrea Frisch, Forgetting Differences: Tragedy, Historiography, and the French Wars of Religion 41 (2015)). … Open this footnote Close When the state pardons an individual, the relationship is dyadic. The public may disapprove the pardon, but it has not been rendered complicit in it. In sharp contrast, the Act of Oblivion forces the public to participate in the governmental act of forgetting. A citizen might vehemently disagree that the offense should be forgotten. Nevertheless, she must still participate in the oblivion. If she does not, she herself will incur a penalty. The problem is that this is the majority of the novel because there isn’t a great deal to the story itself. It takes an age for Nayler to get across the pond to the colonies and even longer for anything further to happen. And then nothing really happens after that until the cheesy Hollywood-esque ending. Like in An Officer and a Spy, Robert Harris has taken a little known historical episode and written a lengthy novel about it - and, like that other novel, Act of Oblivion is unfortunately really boring.

So this is a negative review, however 3 stars are given. The pluses were the writing style was excellent, it wasn’t a drag to read to the point of grumbling, sighing, or eye-rolling. It had just enough to read large sections at a time.He took a while to reply. By the time he spoke the men had gone inside. He said quietly, 'They killed the King.'

Whalley is the only reflective character, confronting the possibility (in the memoir, though not to others) that perhaps God had not been on the side of the Parliamentarians. Goffe and Nayler remain rigid in their views to the end, starkly representing the opposing sides.

Harris doesn’t take sides in his narrative. He explains Puritan and royalist viewpoints accurately and leaves the reader to make their minds up. On the one hand, we have a dysfunctional and morally corrupt monarchy, trying to find its feet in England which had been deprived of a king for a decade. On the other, the radical beliefs of religious purists. You may find your sympathies lie with characters you would never normally align with. One answer might be that Acts of Oblivion commandeer citizens in illegitimate ways. To understand the problem here, consider legal historian James Whitman’s essay, What Is Wrong with Inflicting Shame Sanctions? 14 Open this footnote Close this footnote 14 James Q. Whitman, What I s Wrong with Inflicting Shame Sanctions?, 107 Yale L.J. 1055 (1998). … Open this footnote Close In this work, Whitman explores the mirror image of the Act of Oblivion—the state-enforced remembrance embodied in the shame sanction. Whitman argues that the harm of such sanctions is difficult to parse if we look only at the state and the offender. 15 Open this footnote Close this footnote 15 Id. at 1059. … Open this footnote Close Yet in a critical move, Whitman introduces another party to the shame sanction—the crowd around the offender—to bring the harm of such sanctions into sharper focus. 16 Open this footnote Close this footnote 16 Id. at 1087. … Open this footnote Close One of the challenges of writing about this period is that the intricacies of religious faith and faction can seem distant and abstruse to a modern audience. Goffe is a religious man – he had wanted to become a minister before the war intervened – but Harris doesn’t allow himself to become hung up on the niceties of Christian doctrine. Rather, he makes a broader point about the position of the colonels in New England: the simplicity of their faith and anti-monarchical feeling finds a natural home among the dissenters and Puritans of the New World. The impulses that would animate the revolution a hundred years hence were all there in the English civil war. This does not, alas, mean that the men have an easy time of it in Massachusetts. Following the restoration of the monarchy in 1660, Charles II wants revenge on the men who were responsible for the murder of his father, Charles I. Many of the men who signed the warrant for the King’s execution have already died in the normal course of things, or have been rounded up and imprisoned, to be executed in their turn. But several are still on the run, hiding out in England or in Protestant countries on the continent. And two, Ned Whalley and Will Goffe, have made it all the way to the New World, to hide out in the Puritan settlements there. Richard Nayler is the man appointed to hunt them down, a man whose loyalty to the new King is matched by a personal grievance he holds against Cromwell’s men. Bernadette Meyler’s Theaters of Pardoning 1 Open this footnote Close this footnote 1 Bernadette Meyler , Theaters of Pardoning (2019). … Open this footnote Close offers a profound and provocative meditation on the relationship between forgiveness and the state. In this comment, I follow her methodological and substantive lead by taking literary and legal approaches to a curious form of pardoning she discusses in her work—the “Act of Oblivion.” The Act of Oblivion operated as a super-pardon: It was “a form of general amnesty erasing the record of the underlying events rather than simply remitting punishment.” 2 Open this footnote Close this footnote 2 Id. at 29. … Open this footnote Close Pardon is to oblivion as forgiving is to forgetting.