Drugs without the hot air: Making Sense of Legal and Illegal Drugs

Product Information

this analysis equips readers with the ability to make educated decisions regarding drugs both personally and in their communities.

The historical elements are inevitably of especial piquancy - did you know that the Pope Leo XIII endorsed cocaine-infused wine? I include alcohol and tobacco in this; Nutt certainly makes a powerful case against both of them, which I appreciated.

There was certainly a legitimate question as to whether new breeds of cannabis were more harmful than the sort that had been considered by Runciman and the ACMD in the past. Do not read this book if you have convinced yourself that drugs are completely bad, prohibition is the only answer and discussion is for wimps, do-gooders and left-leaning trendies.

Here, he explains how they could work, as well as describing the known effects of various popular legal and illegal drugs. I don't think you could ask for a more sensible, clear-eyed, and useful book about drugs, from the ones your doctor prescribes to the ones your bartender serves you to the ones you can go to jail for possessing. But again they were just way to abstract and felt like a cursory glance at potential policy solutions rather than a thoughtful engagement with them. This book only serves to reinforce my views in this area (inevitably), and provides me with a strong scientific and ethical case about how to minimise the harms of drug use.Perhaps by dispensing with technical language and explaining the facts clearly, policy-makers may sit up and take note. I would have loved to have learned more about the traditional relationship between the ACMD and the government, he gives something like a paragraph on this topic that I think had to be far richer and would either paint a picture of a relationship that has grown fraught recently or one that has been flawed from the start, each of which suggestion we should take different actions about the problem. Being sacked, then, might have been a liberation for Nutt, who later cofounded the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD), where he was joined by scientists who had resigned from the ACMD for holding similar beliefs. Six presented the problems associated with alcohol better than any other place I've seen, and did a really good job to succinctly make the case for why we should think about it differently than we do. It helps that, although the book takes a ‘liberal’ stance compared to the current law, it’s not derived from a naive libertarianism.

A condition from which (from the paper) “ The harmful consequences are well established – about 10 people a year die of it and many more suffer permanent neurological damage as had my patient. I'm going to give it 5* not because of how much of a good read it was but because it's probably the most accessible and well thought out book on this topic that I've come across. You may not think so, because we arbitrarily divide drugs into those that are legal and those that are illegal. Last week I was on a train with two guys sitting just behind me steadily getting drunk on beer and talking loudly. As it stands, it looks like the current drugs legislation has done nothing to ameliorate the supply, the demand for and the harm done by these drugs.The UK introduced the Psychoactive Substances Act in 2016, which makes all substances that affect the brain illegal – unless they are alcohol, tobacco or caffeine. The War on Drugs has failed unilaterally, and Nutt argues that we should place facts, science, and reality above the emotional knee-jerk reaction that led to prohibition in the first place. In October 2009, †a lecture I’d given a few months before was released as a pamphlet on the internet. In the US there were more than 60,000 deaths from opioids in 2017, a total greater than all the American deaths in the Vietnam war. Nutt's definition of “harm” is based on sixteen variables that range from drug-specific mortality (“death from poisoning,” i.

His governmental bosses were even more displeased: He was soon fired, earning the sobriquet “the scientist who was sacked. Rugby may therefore be over a ‘threshold’ required to enforce a prohibition on contact rugby in schools. This book covers various aspects of drug use: how drugs work, how harmful they are, what addiction is, what treatments are available and so on. I responded in The Times that I didn’t understand what he meant when he said I had crossed the line from scie. For example, when ecstasy took off as a club drug, some venues started selling bottled water and providing “chill-out rooms” where patrons could cool off and hydrate.

Drugs without the hot air is a highly readable and informative survey of the current state of play on recreational drug use and abuse by one of our leading clinical psychopharmacologists.