About this deal
The scoring assessment was applied consistently and equitably by the evaluation team with no evidence of bias
The FM had no fairness concerns related to the assessment of financial proposals. 4.2.5. Fairness monitor specialist observations: Request for proposals process PSPC has implemented an integrated system that supports its financial, procurement and real property business lines using SAP ECC, known as SIGMA which includes SAP Business Intelligence (BI, SAP Productivity Pak and other SAP tools and applications).The FM confirmed with each member of the evaluation team that they were in agreement with the final consensus scores and rationale
All four proposals were deemed to have met the technical bid requirements of the RFP. The FM had no fairness concerns related to the technical bid evaluation. 4.2.4. Financial proposal assessment As the Department continues to leverage DRMIS to meet evolving requirements, and as functionality is increased and organizational coverage is widened (for example, the integration into DRMIS of supply chain functionality and other business processes such as those related to real property management) it is expected that DRMIS will grow to over 30,000users in the coming years. These future opportunities will allow the organization to achieve maximum benefit from its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms. Four proposals were received by the submission closing date and time. 4.2.2. Fairness monitor specialist observations explanation of fairness and the need for objectivity, consistency and equitable treatment of all proposals The PSPC individual assigned to complete the assessment of financial proposals reviewed and verified the financial proposal of each bid. The individual verified that each financial proposal was complete and complied with the requirements of the RFP.
Play virtual drums online and learn music with the best drum games for kids
Each Bid’s responses to the rated requirements were reviewed separately, on an item-by-item basis against the identified evaluation criteria. For each requirement, the individual evaluator scores and the rationale for the scores were reviewed and discussed by the team. The evaluators used a consensus approach to determine a single score and rationale for each rated requirement that all evaluators agreed to. The consensus score and associated rationale was recorded in the master record Experienced highways specialist John Swift has joined Waterman’s Glasgow team as Associate Director to take a leading role in developing Waterman’s nation-wide DRIMS (Dynamic Response Intelligent Monitoring) offering. The submissions were logged and recorded upon receipt, clearly identifying that these were submitted on time The process for establishing one score from a team of evaluators was established prior to the receipt of proposals (consensus scoring was used) Technical mandatory requirements were reviewed for compliance with the information provided in both the compliance matrix and in the substantiating information in the proposal. A record of compliance or non-compliance was recorded in the master record along with the rationale