ODROID C4 C4 4.0GB 4 x 2.0GHz

Product Information

During the 15 years when more than 1 million ODROID SBCs were shipped, there must have been very diverse demands. If your bias against Linux is irreversible at this point, perhaps you could try Android instead. It is officially supported by HK on Odroid C4: https://wiki.odroid.com/odroid-c4/os_im ... id/android python-setuptools-1:47.1.1-1 re2-1:20200601-1 systemd-245.6-1 systemd-libs-245.6-1 systemd-sysvcompat-245.6-1 vlc-3.0.10-2 Once again it's running with fbdev, and although you can start it from desktop, the desktop can cause some issues in displaying.

HardKernel released several different devices between 2008~2014. RPi had only a SINGLE device the entire time. md4c-0.4.4-1-aarch64 65,4 KiB 2,13 MiB/s 00:00 [#######################################################] 100% systemd-libs-245.6-1-aarch64 457,7 KiB 1990 KiB/s 00:00 [#######################################################] 100%IMHO, using USB-C to power an SBC is more the result of a current fad than technical necessity. USB-C is used for data, for graphics and for power, as a result you better read the documentation of the hardware AND of the cable before plugging a cable into something. This so-called universality has become a mess and it is easy to find endless online threads of users trying to solve the issue of which cable to use for what. I guess we have to thank the Apple "think different" for that, Apple being the expert at trying to establish standard that do not survive, FireWire dead, USB-C became a mess, Thunderbolt adoption been quite questionable, except in Apple world. git-2.27.0-1-aarch64 6,1 MiB 2,65 MiB/s 00:02 [#######################################################] 100% Android 9 “Pie” 64-bit is available, and we will release a full source code BSP and pre-built image together. Android user land supports 32-bit as well as 64-bit applications with a Vulkan capable ARM Mali GPU driver. Another big improvement is to support the AndroidThings compatible framework, this will provide an easy development environment to control hardware peripherals on Android using powerful Java APIs. The ODROID-C4 is not a Google AndroidThings-certified device, and Hardkernel’s Android source code does not include the Google AndroidThings source code. Currently there is NO support for ODROID Hardware for Windows. Even IF you would be able to run Windows in a non-supportive way due to the fact that most drivers are missing for Windows and MicoSoft will not implement these drivers just cause you ask nicely. You would end up with a Windows that can do "nothing". You could not run any 3D application, you could not use the GPIOs you could not watch Videos as it would not support video decoding. That is the reason I joined this forum, To try and answer Manjaro related questions. But only Strit have Odroids and HK doesn't recognize Manjaro as s Odroid contributor just because no one from Manjaro posted much on HK Forum.

If anyone can report on Panfrost support, I'd be very interested in reading about that as I can't find any status updates about Panfrost's Bifrost developments anywhere!Many may argue, that the "evolving ODROID products" actually triggered RPi to get out of their shell and do some progress of their own (and by now there are many other competitors on the market that also trigger RPi). One problem when using Netboot Installer is that Desktop installation would not be fully completed. Therefore, Removed HDMI-CEC from full volume devices (allow control volume from other remotes when CEC connected) ncdu-1.15-1-aarch64 40,3 KiB 3,93 MiB/s 00:00 [#######################################################] 100% Why would I buy a RPi for nearly twice the price to match the minimal specification to run Windows on it, which in the end does not even run 10% of the available software that would run on a similar priced x86 board?

Dear coleagues. It seems that you trying to absolutelly ignore main reason for using a Windows, which is simplicity. You hidding it behind faulty reason that you suggest - performance. No, I'm not planning to build HPC on Odroid C4. The plan is to make things easier, that on linux usually are much more difficult. If you will be unable to do the things right - your customers simply will choose the product of the other producers. I like Odroid C4, it seems that it has a far more better performance than RPi, so I still have a hope... Linux c4.test.2020.05.14 5.7.0-rc7-8-MANJARO-ARM #1 SMP Sat May 30 22:55:31 CEST 2020 aarch64 GNU/Linux Power 12v @ .375A +-.025 4.50W (.409A-.336A,4.91W-4.03W) (.397A-.355A,4.76W-4.26W) (.380A-.360A,4.56W-4.32W) ii linux-image-5.14.0-odroid-arm64 5.14.18-202202091916~impish arm64 Linux 5.14 for 64-bit ARMv8 machinesIf you compare the C4 versus the Odroid N2(+) and the RK3399's, then yeah, it is slower. About two cores worth, to be exact. The down side: they are re-engineering their Panfrost driver to get it in line with the official tech info, so we have to wait a little for that now as well. If you want to use Chromium anyway, make sure to start it with the option --use-gl=none or else it will try to use MESA with Software rendering which is very slow and will cause even more slowdowns.