The Kolbrin Bible: 21st Century Master Edition

Product Information

Whether it is only the compilation contained in the modern Book that is being called a hoax, or the entire content of the manuscript is somewhat uncertain. If it is the modern book named the Kolbrin Bible which is being called a hoax, there may be some truth to that statement, as the modern book can absolutely be found nowhere in antiquity. It is the only document of its kind to tell the entire story of human creation, including the people who walked this earth before the coming of Adam and Eve mentioned in the Holy Bible. Answer:The Ph.D. Glenn Kimball, expert in ancient manuscripts from the Southern Illinois University, and lecturer and writer of more studies on King Arthur, archeology, Egyptology, Anthropology and Quantum Physics, has surfaced this book quite recently in his research. He is the most prominent authority in the field concerning this book. The documents were written during the intertestamental period, Kimball explained, and its final form was intact by the beginning of the second century A.D. This is the outcome of his research. I consider it valid. The Knights Templar eventually took possession of these documents (to protect them from the likes of King Edward I of England) and redacted The Kolbrin to reflect their point of view, Kimball noted. A typical example of an expert scientist involved with the book is James Mc Canney, who as an astrofysicist left mainstream science because of his opinions on the electomagnetic nature of celestial mechanics. The book is part of the discussion on the possible existence of a planet X also called Nibiru that would return once in a three thousand years or so. It is a paradigmatic discussion these days, and this book is relevant to this discussion because it seems to deliver historical proof for the case. rpba ( talk) 13:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] That is Glenn Kimball, the Ph.D. in Communications? [1] Not really a relevant Ph.D. for this kind of studies (or for astrophysics, for that matter). It is unclear whether he really is a Ph.D. and a lecturer [2]. Have you any evidence of him ever contributing anything to some scholarly journal about these subjects (ancient manuscripts)? As far as I can see, I have no reason to consider his "research" as valid at all... (edit conflicted) And Mc Canney is about as fringe as they come (as is Nibiru). So a communcations expert and an astrophysicist have concluded that these books are indeed over 3,000 years old... Fram ( talk) 13:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] A man asked, "Where is God?" Jesus took a piece of bread and gave it to the man, saying,"Take this and hold it". Then He said, "Put out the other hand". He poured a little water on the upturned palm and said, "Now you have felt the power of God, for without His spirit in the bread and in the water these would not exist for you. Split a billet of wood and God will be there. Lift up a stone and you will find Him". The king said to the Chief of All Druthin, "Do we not have the source of light in a grail egg? " The Druthin replied, "The sun shines not and the Esures (servants of Light) will not come without the presence of the Great Gleamer which provides their sustenance. There can be no incarnation of light on Earth unless there be, behind it, a greater light".

KOLBRIN BIBLE - REJECTED SCRIPTURES SELECTIONS FROM THE KOLBRIN BIBLE - REJECTED SCRIPTURES

They are a race who enjoys unmanly pleasures, who delights in the infliction of pain on the helpless but cringes like a dog at the prospect of its own suffering. Whose approbation is more to be feared and its friendship more to be shunned than its enmity. Never will I surrender to people whose ways I abhor, nor will I ever desire to live to see my countrymen treated as servile serfs. May the Great Godly Powers be with us now in the great testing time, as we gird ourselves to face the issue". Another said, 'Tell us how we may best serve God". Jesus replied, "Talk not of serving God as you would serve a king. In serving God man serves himself. You ask in your heart, shall you be this or that or a priest. Let your own heart point the best way, and having chosen it follow it with devotion and fortitude." You are not considered reliable beause you're hiding behind another authority than your own power of reason. Wikipedia should have a character and intelligence of its own too! I consider that inevitable. rpba ( talk)13:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] Well, it's actually the other way around - one of the base policies ( Wikipedia:No_original_research) is for Wikipedia to be an encyclopedia which should not contain original thought. -- Minimaki ( talk) 14:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Navigation menu

Revelation 8:7 YLT98 and the first messenger did sound, and there came hail and fire, mingled with blood, and it was cast to the land, and the third of the trees was burnt up, and all the green grass was burnt up. The Kolbrin is purported to be a 3,600 year old book in the form of a scroll that was housed in the Library of Alexandria, Egypt along with about 700,000 other scrolls which contained the history and knowledge of the ancient world. When Julius Caesar invaded Egypt at the time of Cleopatra the library was burned in 48 B.C. However, some few scrolls were saved by people who removed them from the library before it was totally consumed in fire. While I agree with you that it is obviously a hoax, the rebuttal you propose would be original research. That is the basic reason of WP:FRINGE: if you have things that are obviously nonsense, but which haven't received any mainstream attention (not even for debunking it), then it shouldn't have an article on Wikipedia. Fram ( talk) 08:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] You are right that some of my arguments above are techically WP:OR, but do we have to await an academic rebuttal, before we can say that the article is about a load of trash? I would prefer deletion, but am afraid of re-creation, and us having to go through all this again. Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] Comment. The article as it stands now is quite confusing. The article (improbably) asserts the antiquity of these manuscripts, while including it among modern pseudepigraphia. A factual article on the history, the claims made by these texts, and who promotes them, may well pass muster; the article I read doesn't seem to have this information ready. No opinion yet on whether this fringe theory has sufficient circulation to be notable, whether on the Mormon level, the Scientology level, or even on the Oahspe level. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 15:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The Kolbrin Bible: 21st Century Master Edition - Google Books

Jesus had spells of rapture and His male kinsfolk declared He was out of His mind, so they sought to have Him put under restraint. But the womenfolk said He was harmless, and in cases such as this their words colored the law of the land. Jesus loved His father, who had taught Him His trade. He consoled Himself with the scriptures which said, "I will become His father and He shall be My son". I am not such as these whose minds are fevered with an evil ferment. I rule over true men, little schooled in craftiness and deceit, real men born to fight and withstand adversity. The code they live by is that of manliness. True men indeed who, in the cause of freedom, willingly heed the call to arms and stake their lives on the outcome. They willingly offer themselves as a sacrifice for the future of their womenfolk and children and their lands and property". These texts are claimed in the introduction to have been kept at Glastonbury Abbey and the first section transcribed to bronze sheets, allowing them to survive the fire of 1184, which the text's publishers allege was set to destroy these and other heretical texts. At a wedding feast Jesus was asked, "Master, why do You come to this place when it is a gathering place of those who seek only their own pleasure and will drink to excess if it is provided?" Jesus said, "Our purpose here is to make glad the hearts of the hosts and to share in their enjoyment, blending their pleasure with ours. There will always be those who are neglectful of their obligations and who concern themselves only with their own well-being. Yet, is this reason enough not to bring happiness to those who have invited us?"

Is not your whole argument about Iolo Morganwg and recent Druidism as a source for the alleged text also an example of WP:OR? Peterkingiron ( talk) 19:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ] Exodus was the geneses of the Holy Bible and The Kolbrin Bible. For the Hebrews, their descendants have continuously celebrated this escape from bondage with the Passover, their most celebrated yearly holiday. The Kolbrin is the first Judaic-Christian document that unites the events described in the currently accepted Bible. It speaks of events from different periods of time that have been purposely hidden by current Christian textbooks.